The CLCI-100 is a precision bulk current injection probe engineered for conducted RF immunity testing in EMC applications.
Operates over a 10 kHz to 100 MHz frequency range, suitable for IEC 61000-4-6 test environments.
Features a 1.575” (40 mm) window diameter, ideal for clamping onto individual cables or bundles.
Constructed with a 5.75” (146 mm) outer diameter housing to provide durability and mechanical stability.
A compact profile with a 2.75” (70 mm) width ensures easy integration into test setups.
Weighs approximately 4.5 lbs (2.04 kg), offering a solid balance of portability and structural strength.
Equipped with a Type-N (female) input connector for dependable RF signal connections.
Capable of handling up to 100 watts of continuous RF input power across its operating range.
Rated for a maximum core temperature of 284°F (140°C), supporting extended usage under thermal load.
Compatible accessories include the FCLC-100 Calibration Fixture, ADA-515-2 Adapters, Term-50-100W Power Termination, and ACS-series Power Amplifiers for complete system support.
Frequency range: 10 kHz to 100 MHz
40 mm window fits large cables and bundles
Split-core design for easy clamp-on access
Complies with IEC 61000-4-6 and CISPR 16-1-2
Supports up to 100 watts continuous RF power
Enables both injection and monitoring
1:1 turns ratio for accurate current transfer
Works with FCLC-100 calibration fixture
Durable design with 140°C max core temperature
Includes 3-year manufacturer warranty
Product: Bulk Current Injection Probe
Model: CLCI-100
Frequency Range: 10 kHz to 100 MHz
Window Diameter: 1.575” (40 mm)
Outside Diameter: 5.75” (146 mm)
Width: 2.75” (70 mm)
Weight: 4.5 lbs (2.04 kg)
Input Connector: Type-N (female)
Maximum Input Power: 100 Watts (continuous)
Maximum Core Temperature: 284ºF (140ºC)
Turns Ratio: 1:1
Accessories Available:
ADA-515-2 150Ω to 50Ω Adapters
Term-50-100W Power Termination
The CLCI-100 Bulk Current Injection Probe is used to inject RF energy onto cables/cable bundles to evaluate conducted RF immunity (susceptibility) and to monitor induced current when needed.
The biggest practical difference is the frequency focus:
CLCI-100 is designed for 10 kHz to 100 MHz and is positioned for IEC 61000-4-6 style conducted RF immunity work.
CLCI-400 extends far higher (to 400 MHz) and is used heavily in higher-frequency cable current injection applications.
It’s specifically aligned to IEC 61000-4-6 conducted RF immunity, and the manual also notes it can be used in other conducted susceptibility contexts depending on the test plan.
Per IEC 61000-4-6 guidance, an injection clamp is used when there is no commercially available CDN for the port type you need to test.
A CDN both couples RF and also provides decoupling + a defined impedance environment. A clamp does not provide those decoupling/impedance functions, so the cable current behavior is less controlled and must be verified/managed.
Often, yes. Because a clamp does not establish the required impedance and the current can vary by cable/EUT conditions, IEC 61000-4-6 practice calls for monitoring so current does not exceed the maximum required current.
The probe is essentially a toroidal transformer: when injecting, the probe acts like the primary and the cable(s) through the aperture act like the secondary—no direct electrical contact to the conductor is required.
The FCLC-400 provides a controlled coaxial-type arrangement so the probe can be calibrated for insertion/coupling loss and transfer impedance, and it’s also used to set/establish test drive levels (into defined systems) before testing.
Yes—the CLCI-100 is designed to be compatible with the FCLC-400, and the CLCI-100 manual includes detailed “using the probe with the fixture” sections.
For IEC 61000-4-6 calibration, the manual describes calibrating into a 150 Ω system using 150 Ω to 50 Ω adapters on the fixture, because that matches how the standard defines parts of the test generator / calibration method.
The manual describes two acceptable approaches:
Method A: record the signal generator output setting vs frequency during calibration, then replay those settings during test.
Method B: record forward power vs frequency (using a directional coupler + power meter/sensor) during calibration, then reproduce forward power during test.
A typical complete setup is:
Signal generator → ACS-series RF power amplifier → (directional coupler / power measurement, if using forward-power method) → CLCI-100 injection clamp → cable bundle/EUT, with measurement gear (spectrum analyzer/EMI receiver) used during calibration and/or monitoring.
Com-Power positions its ACS series as geared for IEC 61000-4-6 conducted immunity testing and offers multiple models/frequency bands depending on needed range/power.
Common published ACS examples include models covering bands such as:
150 kHz to 230 MHz (ACS-230 series variants)
150 kHz to 250 MHz (ACS-250-100W)
For the CLCI-100 specifically (10 kHz–100 MHz), many labs select an amplifier that cleanly covers their intended test band and power needs without unnecessary extra range.
Typical supporting items include attenuators, terminations, directional coupler, adapters, and the calibration fixture, depending on whether you’re calibrating via 150 Ω or 50 Ω methods.
A typical workflow looks like this:
Build a controlled calibration setup using the FCLC-400 fixture and the required adapters/attenuators for the intended method (150 Ω system for IEC 61000-4-6 calibration).
Establish target levels (the measured level used for calibration, not just the “headline” Vrms) and ensure measurement chain corrections (like attenuator offsets) are accounted for.
Sweep discrete test frequencies and record either signal generator settings (Method A) or forward power (Method B) that achieve the target measured level at each frequency.
Validate the RF power chain is behaving linearly (avoid saturated amplifier operation) so the calibration remains trustworthy.
Move to the EUT setup and reproduce the calibrated levels while monitoring the injected current as needed.
Common issues that cause bad calibrations or inconsistent results include:
Treating a clamp like a CDN (forgetting the clamp doesn’t create the same controlled impedance/decoupling environment).
Not monitoring current during the actual test, especially when the EUT/cable impedance differs from calibration conditions.
Incorrect attenuator/adapter corrections (calibrating to the wrong measured level because offsets weren’t applied correctly).
Amplifier compression/saturation (calibration points look “okay” but can’t be reproduced consistently because the amplifier is not operating linearly).
Poor bonding to the ground plane / inconsistent physical setup between calibration and test (fixture placement and bonding approach matter for repeatability).
Mixing Method A and Method B assumptions (e.g., calibrate by forward power but attempt to run by generator settings without re-validating the chain).
Yes, it supports current injection & monitoring capability, and its transfer-impedance factor concept is used to convert measured RF voltage at a 50 Ω instrument input into current units.
The 10 kHz–100 MHz range makes it a strong fit for lower-to-mid frequency conducted RF immunity work where clamp injection is acceptable/required and where test teams prioritize repeatable level-setting, current oversight, and efficient power coupling in that band.